Glizer is a nice idea, but its very disturbing that it collect more data's than necessary. Without any agreement or knowing of the players, glizer save these data's and make many of them public. Especially the play- / online-time of a whole day or possible multi-accounts, can be very private informations, that the players didn't want to show. I know its possible to hide many (not all!) of the own informations, but only by register a account at glizer where additionally saved an valid email-address of the user. Thats not acceptable for data protection, so i have some suggestions for more privacy. 1) Just make only the reputation public at default and hide all other Informations like online-time, friends, accounts,... 2) With a glizer account a player should have many more options than only "disable account". There should be options to hide or show any additional informations to public or just to friends.
AW: More privacy! Glizer reports on every connect to every player, that the informations are shared with others, and these are features serveradmins need to evaluate the players. But the "share with friends" options are a good idea, we will implement that in the near future.
Re: More privacy! Thank you for thinking about my "share with friends (only)" suggestion. But i have another plea, that you immediately disable the "Relation Data" at disabled accounts. I mean, "disable" should disable all private informations
AW: More privacy! That's impossible, because relation data are very important informations for server owners and are necessary for the security of the servers and their data-usage.
Re: More privacy! Can they are rly so important? Sure, its possible that accounts in the relation data section can be multiaccounts of the user and this would be nice to know for server owners (if that user and some more accounts are banned). But they can also be friends or just persons, they only use the same network (at work, in school, public wlan,....). Right?
AW: More privacy! we have to collect all of ur data to sell it to facebook or other websites, so they can control you more.
Re: AW: More privacy! U can check 2 things. The IP and the username. Both are given at the same computer or in the same network with a router. Thats say nothing about the real relation between two or more users. Ironic or not, its not that serious, but thats the point. Sure, they won't be sell them, they give them away for free Before the thread will be closed, i will tell you also one thing. Data protection is a basic right in most countries of Europe and especially in Germany, where it is the constitution. You can say "it's only a game, who give a f# on the data's which we collect?" and most ppl will agree. But that don't means, that you decide that for all users.
AW: More privacy! We can check a lot more But we wont tell how and what - otherwise ppl could crack it. Europe has strict data rights, thats true, but these data are in usage for the security and measuring of a server network. We offer to anonymize everything which is not for this purpose.
Re: More privacy! ACTA and all that sh... is also "used for more security" but look what the ppl think about that Whatever, i thougt about a compromise and i hope u think about that. R im right, that the relation data is only worth to know, if the user have a very bad reputation or have a couple of (temp)bans? So that a server owner must take a closer look on users that are in relation to this bad guy? What u think about that, if the relation data is only visible at (very)bad reputation?
AW: More privacy! It's commonly used by serverowners to ban a person with all his second and third account. So it wouldn't be a good idea to block that.
Re: AW: More privacy! With my sugsestion the owner will see all relation users, after he baned a player. As i said, its only hidden if noone of the users have a (very)bad reputation. May u can make a "ban all" function, that also use hidden informations
AW: More privacy! A recursive ban is planned. maybe with these modifications we could modify the visibility of the relation data.
